禅世界论坛

<- 社交登陆。【论坛使用帮助】
美国最高法院首次对大选结果做出判决:拒...
 
Notifications
Clear all

美国最高法院首次对大选结果做出判决:拒绝共和党要求推翻宾州选举结果的申请


Many
 Many
(@many)
Illustrious Member Admin
已加入: 4年 前
帖子: 7148
Topic starter  
 
@fangshim
 
美国最高法院首次对大选结果做出判决:拒绝共和党要求推翻宾州选举结果的申请。整个判决只有一句话,连理由都懒得说。被川粉当成最后希望的最高法院这么无情,让川粉伤透了心。华人川粉发文威胁说,如果最高法院不支持他们,他们就要暴动。
Translate Tweet
 
 

Image

 

Image

 

Image


引用
Many
 Many
(@many)
Illustrious Member Admin
已加入: 4年 前
帖子: 7148
Topic starter  

Supreme Court refuses request from Pennsylvania G.O.P. to overturn state’s election results.

 
 

Demonstrators participated in a “Stop the Steal” outside of the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
Credit...Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to overturn the state’s election results. The justices said they would not block a ruling from Pennsylvania’s highest court that had rejected a challenge to the use of mail ballots in the state. The Supreme Court’s order was all of one sentence, and there were no noted dissents.

The request that the Supreme Court intercede had faced substantial legal hurdles, as it was filed long after the enactment of the challenged statute that allowed mailed ballots and was based on questions of state rather than federal law.

In late November, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled against the plaintiffs, led by Representative Mike Kelly, a Republican, on the first ground, saying they could have challenged a 2019 law allowing vote by mail for any reason more than a year ago.

“At the time this action was filed on Nov. 21, 2020, millions of Pennsylvania voters had already expressed their will in both the June 2020 primary election and the November 2020 general election,” the court said. “Petitioners failed to act with due diligence in presenting the instant claim. Equally clear is the substantial prejudice arising from petitioners’ failure to institute promptly a facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory scheme, as such inaction would result in the disenfranchisement of millions of Pennsylvania voters.”

 

 


回复引用
Share:

【声明】:禅世界论坛尊重言论自由,任何人可讨论佛学、政经、生活和科技等话题。在言论发表前请根据常识和法规自审。论坛管理员和版主有权删除任何不当内容。使用本论坛即表示接受【禅世界论坛规则】【论坛使用帮助】。 【禅世界免责声明】


【Chanworld.org】2017.06.06-2020.04.30-MG